Comments on: Welcome To London Chapter 3 Page 4 https://shiverbureau.com/wordpress/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/ Just another WordPress site Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:43:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: walterostlie https://shiverbureau.com/wordpress/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-382 Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:43:40 +0000 http://shiverbureau.com/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-382 In reply to somebody.

Prolly. oops. Thanks for the heads up.

]]> By: somebody https://shiverbureau.com/wordpress/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-381 Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:09:34 +0000 http://shiverbureau.com/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-381 It’s supposed to be rather’ve then (should be the same pronunciation)

]]> By: walterostlie https://shiverbureau.com/wordpress/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-380 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 16:11:41 +0000 http://shiverbureau.com/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-380 In reply to Narratologist.

Maybe? I don’t really know. I feel like if I was going to say it to someone, I’d prolly say ‘of’, but ‘have’ is prolly correct. I may go back and change it, or maybe Trish speaks bad English like me. 🙂 Thanks for bringing it to my attention though, much appreciated.

]]> By: Narratologist https://shiverbureau.com/wordpress/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-379 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:52:50 +0000 http://shiverbureau.com/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-379 Shouldn’t it be “rather’ve” (contraction of “rather have”) instead of “rather of”?

]]> By: darrell https://shiverbureau.com/wordpress/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-378 Tue, 08 Apr 2014 22:13:57 +0000 http://shiverbureau.com/2014/04/03/welcome-to-london-chapter-3-page-4/#comment-378 It goes boom, does he really need to know the details? 😉

]]>